1. Review this. Confirm by stating "I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ."
I reviewed the rule
of three for writing an EQ.
2. Review the
following EQs and
-Tell us if each meets the rule of
three.
-Tell
why they do or don't.
a. What
is the most important factor in healthy weight loss?
- No, it does not meet the rule of three because it could be more specific, for example, gender, age and other factors that could be included.
b. What
is most important to securing a conviction in a criminal investigation?
- No, it does not meet the rule of three because it is a vague question, for example, they could expand on time period or even starting a different way because the way they start by saying "most important" makes it only open for one possible answer.
c. What is most important in creating a hairstyle that best satisfies a customer?
- Yes, it does meet the rule of three criteria because it is specific by saying "that best satisfies a customer" it allows them to have multiple answers.
d. How can an anesthesiologist best treat chronic pain?
- Yes, it does indeed meet the rule of three criteria because starts with "How can a …" rather than "What is the…" this wording allows the person to have an endless amount of possible answers.
3. Based on your
review of the rule of 3 and your experience with assessing four EQs, please
write another draft EQ for your senior project. The senior team will be
meeting with students shortly for EQ revision and approval; you are expected to
bring your research notebook to that meeting with your EQ draft written inside
in pencil.
- My working Essential Question is How does a
teacher set a learning environment where the majority time is spent on
teaching and learning rather than disciplining?
No comments:
Post a Comment